Wednesday, 9 January 2013

A Guide to the CPC Search Tool on Espacenet

We’ve been following the development and roll-out of the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) over the past year, from the initial release of the CPC scheme to a guide describing how major patent search systems will integrate the CPC into their search features. The CPC has already replaced ECLA as of January 1, 2013, and the Espacenet search system has been updated to reflect these changes. The CPC replaces ECLA in the classification section under the Advanced search form on Espacenet, and the CPC search tool is now available on Espacenet under the “Classification search” option.  The tool allows users to keyword search or browse through the CPC hierarchy, view code definitions, notes, and warnings, and select codes to add to the Advanced search form or use to search directly for patent records.
Continue reading for a visual guide to every feature within the CPC search tool on Espacenet!

From the Espacenet homepage, users can access the CPC search tool by selecting the “Classification search” option in the vertical menu on the left side of the page (below the “Smart search” and “Advanced search” options).  Once the user opens the CPC search tool, a number of quick help links and a clipboard displaying all selected classifications will be displayed below the search menu, as shown in the screenshot below.
Access the CPC search tool by selecting the "Classification search" option.
Access the CPC search tool by selecting the “Classification search” option.
To the right of the search menu, the Cooperative Patent Classification hierarchy is displayed in a collapsed format, with a keyword search form, links to access all main sections of the CPC, and a variety of buttons shown above the hierarchy display.  Keywords (up to 10 keywords in English) can be entered in the search form, and all relevant classifications related to a keyword will be displayed (in a collapsed format) below the search form. The search form accepts Boolean operators and wildcards like *, ?, and #.  Up to five stars will be displayed beside a relevant classification after a keyword search, and more relevant classifications (with more stars) will appear at the top of the list.  The classifications can be expanded to view all narrower codes by selecting the small arrow to the left of the classification symbol and definition.
A user may also enter a classification symbol within the search form, although only one symbol can be entered at a time. After entering a classification symbol in the search form, the symbol will appear below the search form at its location in the classification hierarchy.  All narrower classification codes below the symbol will be automatically expanded.
Select any of the section links (A-Y) beside the keyword search form to view a collapsed list of all main classification codes in that section, and further expand the hierarchy of the section by selecting a main code to view narrower codes.
A collapsed version of the CPC hierarchy, with keyword/symbol search and browsing options.
A collapsed version of the CPC hierarchy, with keyword/symbol search and browsing options.
The buttons displayed below the search form can be used to alter the display of the CPC classifications and hierarchy.  Mouse over each button to view a brief description of its purpose.  The following buttons are available for the CPC search tool:
  • Flip symbols (left or right) – Select the left or right button to switch the classification symbols (and check boxes) to the left or right side of the table.  During testing, the check boxes didn’t appear to work properly when the symbols were flipped to the right side of the table.
Use these buttons to flip the symbols to the left or sight side of the hierarchy table.
Use these buttons to flip the symbols to the left or sight side of the hierarchy table.
  • Toggle tree – Select to view the hierarchy in dot format (more dots indicates a narrower class) or tree format (lines indicate the parent-child relationships between classes).
These  buttons can be used to view the hierarchy in dot format (left) or tree format (right).
These buttons can be used to view the hierarchy in dot format (left) or tree format (right).
  • Toggle notes and warnings always visible – Select this button to display the full text of all notes (blue text) and notes (orange text).  Even if this button is turned off, small icons beside the classification will indicate the presence of a note/warning and can be selected to expand the note/warning text. Additional icons beside a classification, such as a small “S” icon displayed in the screenshot below, currently only open a new browser tab displaying an error message.
Select this button to hide notes and warnings  (top) or make notes and warning always visible (bottom).
Select this button to hide notes and warnings (top) or make notes and warning always visible (bottom).
  • Toggle scheme colors (IPC vs CPC) – Selecting this button will highlight all new CPC text in green, while the original IPC text remains un-highlighted.
Use this button to view original IPC definition text and new CPC definition text (highlighted in green).
Use this button to view original IPC definition text and new CPC definition text (highlighted in green).
  • Toggle dates – View or hide the revision date beside a classification.
Use this button to hide revision dates (top) or display revision dates (bottom).
Use this button to hide revision dates (top) or display revision dates (bottom).
  • Toggle references – Use this button to expand or hide the additional reference text for a classification. Even when this button is turned off, the availability of reference text is indicated by the (…) icon, which can be selected to expand the reference text for that classification.
Use this button to hide reference text (top) or display the full reference text (bottom).
Use this button to hide reference text (top) or display the full reference text (bottom).
  • Toggle 2000-series – View or hide the CPC 2000 indexing area. According to the Espacenet homepage, “this indexing area largely stems from the EPO’s former ICO codes and controlled keywords (KWs).”
Use this button to display the CPC 2000 indexing area.
Display the CPC 2000 indexing area.
After locating a relevant classification symbol within the hierarchy and customizing the display using the buttons described above, the user can add the relevant classifications to the “Selected classifications” clipboard by clicking the check box beside a classification.  Selecting a classification check box will automatically select the check boxes of all narrower classifications, and the code listed on the clipboard will include the label “/low” to indicate the inclusion of all narrower classifications.
Select a check box beside a code to add that classification and all child classifications to the clipboard.
Select a check box beside a code to add that classification and all child classifications to the clipboard.
The user can select the code on the clipboard and switch the label from “/low” to “/exact”, in order to only include the specific classification code within any searches conducted from the clipboard, without the inclusion of narrower classifications.
Switch the selected classification from "low" (all child classifications included) to "exact" (only the exact selected code).
Switch the selected classification from “low” (all child classifications included) to “exact” (only the exact selected code).
Selecting the “/exact” label will automatically de-select all narrower classifications in the hierarchy table.
An exact search of a classification will only search the selected code, excluding all child classifications.
An exact search of a classification will only search the selected code, excluding all child classifications.
After selecting all relevant codes to add to the clipboard, the user can then select to search within the Worldwide database on Espacenet for records containing  all selected classifications by choosing the “Find patents” option on the clipboard.  The user will automatically be taken to the search result list.
Choose "Find patents" to search for the codes directly on Espacenet, and go directly to patent search results.
Choose “Find patents” to search for records listing the codes within the Worldwide database patent collection, and go directly to patent search results.
The user can also select the “Copy to search form” option on the clipboard to enter all selected classifications into the CPC section of the Advanced search form.  This option allows the user to add additional terms to the query within the Advanced search form before conducting the search with the selected CPC codes.
Choose "Copy to search form" to enter the selected codes in the Advanced search form.
Choose “Copy to search form” to enter the selected codes in the Advanced search form.
Conclusion
The new CPC search tool improves upon the old ECLA search tool by adding a number of useful display features, including the option to view the hierarchy in tree or dot format and the option to highlight the new CPC text. Users can also select whether they want to include all narrower classifications when copying relevant codes to the clipboard.  Some bugs are still visible in this new tool, such as the icons that currently only open tabs containing error messages and the inability to select check boxes when the classification symbols are flipped to the right side of the table.  Despite these small issues, this tool is still an important new feature on Espacenet that will come in handy for professional patent searchers using the CPC during prior art searches.

6 Recent STN Updates, and a New STN Platform!

the newest features and coverage available on the STN search platform. The STN platform allows professional patent searchers to hunt for a wide range of relevant prior art by searching through valuable patent and non-patent literature (NPL) databases using a flexible command-line interface. Back in October of 2012, we described the expanded numeric property search feature available on 14 patent and NPL databases on STN. Throughout the remainder of 2012, STN had a number of additional coverage and feature updates, ranging from the addition of a Japanese patent full-text database to the implementation of the new Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) within the portal. STN also recently announced the beta release of the first version of a new STN platform, which combines command-line searching and an intuitive user interface.
After the jump, learn about six of the most recent major updates to the coverage and features on the STN platform, and read about the release of the new version of STN!

6 Recent Updates to STN
All major recent updates to the STN platform can be found on the Intellogist System Report for STN, and the following updates represent some of the major improvements to the system during November and December 2012:
  • According to the November Issue of STNews:
    In March 2012, CAS announced that the MARPAT database would be enhanced with English-, German- and Japanese-language patents from 1987. The addition of English- and German-language patents for 1987 is now complete. Processing of English- and German-language patents from 1985 and 1986 and Japanese-language patents from 1987 is continuing. We are pleased to report that Markush information from over 2,600 patent publications has been added to date.
  • According to the November Issue of STNews:
    STN now includes JPFULL, the full-text Japanese database of patent applications and patent specifications. Currently JPFULL covers application years 2006 onwards. Historical data will continue to load (one year per week in reverse chronological order) until all records back to 1964 have been incorporated. Once completed, the database will contain approximately 16 million records.
  • According to STN International:
    From week 47/2012 onwards, CPC data are available for new and updated records of the INPADOC databases. Users have full access to all details of the CPC data including CPC codes and attributes. A CPC thesaurus feature supports classification searching, helping users to identify relevant codes and searching the hierarchy of the codes.
    For details and search examples see the INPADOC News 2012/11.
  • According to Information Today:
    FIZ Karlsruhe announced that the complete ReaxysFile is now available on STN. ReaxysFile now contains the full content from Reaxys, a leading source for chemical substance and reaction data produced by Elsevier. [...] Information on several million substances has been added, including inorganic substances and substances derived from patents, bringing the database to the same content level as in Reaxys.
  • According to the December 2012 Issue of STNewsline, users can now streamline SDI set up with the new STN command, SDI STANDARD, effective December 9, 2012. The SDI STANDARD command:
    • Increases efficiency by reducing the number of questions to set up an SDI
    • Works with single file and multifile SDIs, including SDI packages
    • Accounts for SDI set-up best practices
    • Maintains flexibility with ability to customize settings using SDI EDIT
    • Reduces STN MAIL charges by changing the default Notifications setting to NO (do not send notifications) from YES
  • According to the CAS website:
    In December, CAS began enhancing its reaction coverage in SciFinder and on STN’s CASREACT® database with the addition of reactions from nearly 900 dissertations published in the Selected Organic Reaction Database (SORD) between 1961-2009.
New STN Platform
The CAS website issued a press release on December 13, 2012 that describes the first version of a new STN platform:
The STN partners, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) and FIZ Karlsruhe, are pleased to announce that Version One of the new STN platform is now available in beta for fixed fee customers. This is the first major milestone in a multi-year initiative to create the next generation of STN, the choice of patent experts.
The focus of this first version has been on developing the core search and retrieval system for new STN. This release combines the complete CAS REGISTRY and Chemical Abstracts content along with Thomson Reuters’ Derwent World Patents Index®.[...]
A new approach for STN is to allow organization of work in projects for easy management of search queries and results. New technologies are designed to process broad and complex searches with industry-leading performance. This is vital for patent searchers to keep pace with the continued increase of disclosed research and patent information from around the world.
The new workflow integrates the power of command line with an intuitive user interaction that enables professionals to leverage their expertise and realize instantaneous results. For the first time, text and structures can be combined in a single query to simplify searching for chemical information.
The STN Partners will incorporate additional content and functionality in the new architecture with ongoing versions. Full text patent content will be added throughout 2013. [...] The current STN system, including STN Express® and the other STN products will continue to be available and fully supported throughout the development of the new platform.
Conclusion
The STN platform is a crucial tool for professional patent searchers, since it allows users to search a wide range of both patent and NPL databases with the ability to craft complex queries using command-line syntax. The STN platform regularly adds new coverage to existing databases, such as the additional content recently added to MARPAT, CASREACT, and ReaxysFile. The system also occasionally adds new patent full-text databases, like the new JPFULL file that contain full-text Japanese patent records. Besides the new coverage added and recent implementation of the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) within the portal, CAS and FIZ-Karlsruhe are also regularly improving the user’s search experience on STN by adding new search and display features (like the new SDI command) and even creating a completely new version of the platform with a streamlined user interface. The roll-out of the new STN platform will be a slow and ongoing process, but it’s exciting to witness the release of a working version of the new platform that includes key prior art content like CAS REGISTRY and DWPI. Hopefully, the new version of the platform will soon be available to all STN users and include expanded coverage.

Free Family, Citation, and Legal Status Searches for Chinese Patent Documents on PSS of SIPO

By comparing the free patent search options available for Chinese patent documents, and one option was the free English patent search interface created by SIPO. SIPO also provides another free patent search tool called the Patent Search and Service System (PSS), which went online for public testing in April 2011 and currently includes both English and Chinese search options.  According to an EPO press release, the PSS includes “a number of advanced search and retrieval possibilities, such as citation and family searches, cross-lingual retrieval, legal status information, full text data and machine translation.”  The tool allows users to access CN data on patents, utility models, and designs from 1985 onwards, and the system is updated monthly. Worldwide patent document data covering 97 countries (most likely INPADOC data) also appears to be searchable under the structured search form. The tool is free, but registration is necessary to access many of the more advanced tools of the system, such as viewing the Search History tab and downloading full PDF documents.  Unfortunately, registration proved to be a bit problematic for an English-language user, and some features were still not accessible even after registering for the portal.
Read on to learn about the advanced search tools accessible for Chinese and worldwide patent documents on PSS, and also learn about the registration and access problems that you may encounter when using this system.
Registration
From the English-language home page of PSS (the basic search form), users can register for an account by selecting the “Regist” button in the top right corner of the screen, beside the “Login” button.  The user is then prompted to enter user name, password, email, verification code, name, additional optional personal information, and indicate that they have read the “Agreement of System Application.” I initially had some trouble registering for an account on the portal, since the name field would not accept an English-language name. I ended up using Chinese characters to enter in the name field, and the registration was accepted.
After signing in to the portal, I am still unable to access the “Batch” and “Download” tabs (described below), and a message appears on these tabs stating “Sorry, you don’t have permission to access this menu.”  After registration, I am able to access the “Search History” tab, “File” tab, and I can download a full TIFF version of Chinese patent documents.
Download a TIFF file containing the full CN document image after registration for an account.
Download a TIFF file containing the full CN document image after registering for an account on PSS.
Search Tools
The English-language version of the platform has seven tabs available, including:
  • Basic Search – Select one of the options to search by keyword (SE option searches title, abstracts, rights claim, and classification number simultaneously), application number, publication number, applicant/assignee, inventor name, or document title. After selecting the field search option, enter the query in the search form. Boolean operators AND/OR/NOT and quotations to indicate phrase searches are accepted in the search form. The user can mouse over the search form to view instructions on correct query formation for each selected field search option.
Basic search form on PSS.
Basic search form on PSS.
  • Structured Search – Under this tab, users have the option to search by “Worldwide patent documents,” “CN patent documents,” or “Worldwide patent documents other than CN.” Selecting only the CN collection allows the user to search through additional fields, like “Brief description of design model” and “Zip code of the applicant.” After selecting the collection to be searched, the user can construct a query through either a selection of fielded text boxes or through a command-line interface at the bottom of the form. The command line accepts nested queries, field operators, Boolean operators, parentheses, and proximity operators. The users can scroll over the text box of the search fields to view any available help information about correctly formatting queries.
Structured search form (for the CN document collection) on PSS.
Structured search form (for the CN document collection) on PSS.
  • Search History – View previous searches conducted through the portal. This tool is for registered users only.
  • File – This section possibly allows the user to access file history information for a given CN document. This tool is for registered users only.
  • Useful Tools – This section provides users with a number of additional search features:
    • IPC – Simultaneously locate Chinese and English-language definitions for an IPC classification.
    • Family – Conduct a family search based on a given publication number.
    • Citation – Conduct a citation search based on a publication or application number.
    • Legal Status – Conduct a legal status search based on a publication or application number.
    • Applicant/Patentees Alias – Find alternate versions of the applicant/assignee name.
    • Country Code – View the correct country code and organization name for each national or regional organization.
    • Bilingual Dictionary – Look up terms from Chinese to English or English to Chinese.
    • Relevant Classification – Enter an IPC code and find the closest corresponding code in ECLA, USPC, F-Index, or F-Term.
    • Relevant Term – Enter a basic terms and retrieve synonyms.
IPC concordance tool on PSS.
IPC concordance tool on PSS under the “Useful Tools” section.
  • Batch – This section possibly refers to batch downloads of CN documents. This section is only available for registered users.
  • Download- This section possibly refers to PDF downloads of CN documents. The Download section is only available for registered users.
Viewing Results
After conducting a search, users can view basic bibliographic data in a results list (10 results per page). Users can select or de-select all results per page and browse the full records or add the results to their list of favorites (only 10 documents can be included in the favorites list at one time). The results list page includes both the search history and favorites list on the right side of the hit list.
Basic bibliographic data and links to full record, family, legal status, etc. provided in search results.
Basic bibliographic data and links to full record, family, legal status, etc. provided in search results.
Each result in the hit list includes (when available):
  • Option to view or hide basic bibliographic fields (AN, AD, PN, PD, TI, etc.).
  • Details – Full record, including abstract with English translation and representative image. Users can view the full text image and translate the full document text from English to Chinese or Chinese to English. The full record view for US and EP documents also includes examination result browsing options. Registered users can also download full-text TIFF files of selected documents from the full-record view.
Full record view for a CN document, with option to translate full-text from Chinese to English.
Full record view for a CN document, with option to translate full-text from Chinese to English.
  • Family – View a table of related family members for a patent document.
  • Citation – View a list of patent citation documents, non-patent citation documents, and cited documents.
Citation data for a CN document.
Citation data for a CN document.
  • Comparative Documents – View lists of relevant patent documents and relevant non-patent documents.
  • Legal Status – View legal status data for the document.
  • Applicant Information- View information on the applicant/assignee (such as address/zip code/country).
 Help Options
For English-language users, the main help material is accessible through the tooltips that appear when the user scrolls over various search forms. A detailed Chinese-language help file is available here. English users can also access the most recent user guide from the EPO about the PSS system at the “Searching in databases – China” section of the EPO website. As of December 2012, the most recent user guide from the EPO on registering and document retrieval through PSS is available here.
Conclusion
Despite the registration problems and access limitations for some sections of PSS, the system still offers flexible search tools and excellent viewing/document download features for CN documents. The legal status, citation, and family search options for CN documents on an English-language interface are unique features for a free online search portal.  The “Useful Tools” section of the portal also includes some very helpful tools for general query formation, such as a bilingual dictionary, applicant alias look-up, a synonym tool, and even an IPC-to-USPC/ECLA/F-Index/F-Term concordance tool.  Professional patent searchers often need to search for CN prior art, and SIPO’s PSS will be a great place to start scoping out a relevant collection of CN patent documents.

Patents for Easy Cooking-- a FUNNY ONE BUT INTERESTING

Some people enjoy spending hours lovingly preparing their meals (whether that meal involves gourmet turkey stuffing or home-style barbecue), and there is nothing wrong with that. I’m just the type of person who would rather toss something in the microwave for two minutes and eat it on the go, rather than spending half the morning preparing Lemon-Ricotta Poppy Seed Pancakes and a Spanish Omelet with Romesco Sauce.  If you’re a person who feels that boiling a pot of water is about as far as you’re willing to travel into the culinary world, then you have many inventors to whom you should silently thank for letting us live in a culture of convenient food products.  From the toaster pastry to the frozen TV-dinner, there are foods for any time of day that only take moments to prepare.
Read on for a quick review of some of the quintessential food-related patents (found on Google Patents) that have simplified the cooking process!

1. US 6099875 – Individual serving size cereal package
For those of us too lazy to pour cereal and milk into a bowl.
For those of us too lazy to pour cereal and milk into a bowl.
All you need to do is add water to this mixture of “dry cereal pieces” and “dry milk product, such as dry powdered milk or milk substitute, and other additives” to create a “food product that is nutritional and convenient to eat.” It doesn’t get much faster or easier than that.
2. US D468889 – Segmented cooked dough food product
Breakfast of champions.
Breakfast of champions.
This design patent for a segmented toaster pastry allows you to share the deliciousness with others.  Just because you don’t cook doesn’t mean you can’t show off your culinary expertise to your friends.  Just pop this pastry in the toaster for 60 seconds, divide into segments, and earn the respect of your peers as a toaster pastry master.
3. US 5780082 – Process for making a food product of the pizza type, in the shape of a Pocket
The staple food for all middle school students.
The staple food for all middle school students.
Here is a food item that is world-renown for the quick and simple preparation process and as a filling, hearty meal that will scald your mouth with molten cheese goo.
4. US 4267199 – Noodle soup mix
The staple food for all college students.
The staple food for all college students.
The best trait of this noodle mix patent is its versatility.  You can take the 10 minutes to boil a pot of water and actually make the soup, or you can just sprinkle on the seasoning and eat the noodle bar as a crunchy snack.
5. US D302068 -TV dinner tray
The cheapest way to have dinner and a show..
The cheapest way to have dinner and a show.
The frozen TV dinner gives aspiring chefs the best of both worlds: a nearly infinite variety of choices for a home-cooked meal, and the speedy cooking time that only comes from microwavable food. The presentation may not be on par with a five-star restaurant, but the price is certainly better.  You can also watch Seinfeld while dining.

Free Online Patent Search Portals: Syria and Saudi Arabia

When conducting patent searches or patent analysis projects that are global in scope, patent search professionals will often need to locate bibliographic or full-text data for patent records from certain issuing authorities that have very limited or zero coverage within the regularly used INPADOC data.  The patent searcher will then need to find alternative methods for locating the patent data, such as accessing the data directly on the patent authority website.
For example, the patenting authorities for Syria (SY) and Saudi Arabia (SA) are not covered by INPADOC (although Saudi Arabia is a member of the GCC, which is covered by INPADOC). Searchers will therefore need to go directly to the issuing authority websites to locate free online patent data for Syria and Saudi Arabia.
After the jump, learn how to access the patent search service on the Syrian Patent Office website and the KACST Patent Search for Saudi Arabia!

Syria: Syrian Patent Office Search
The website for the Syrian Patent Office is available in both English and Arabic, although the patent search form is only accessible in Arabic. From the English-language homepage of the Syrian Patent Office website, users can select the “Search Patents” option in the main vertical menu. The user will then be directed to the Arabic-language patent search form, since “the patent index is only available in Arabic.” Users can utilize a machine translation tool like Google Translate to translate the search form into their language of choice, although search queries should be entered into the form in Arabic.
The patent search form available through the Arabic version of the Syrian Patent Office website includes two search options:
  • Quick Search – Enter a keyword to search for inventor name or patent document title.
  • Advanced Search – Use the fielded search form to search by inventor name, applicant name, ISBN, filing date, IPC code, patent number, grant date, priority number, priority date, title keyword, or abstract keyword.
Quick and advanced search options on the Syrian Patent Office Search (translated from Arabic to English using Google Translate).
Quick and advanced search options on the Syrian Patent Office Search (translated from Arabic to English using Google Translate).
Search results are displayed in a list that includes patent title and inventor name for each result (10 results per page). Users can’t translate the search result page directly on Google Translate, so they will need to cut and paste the hit list text into the machine translation tool to view a translation from Arabic to the language of choice.
Results for a patent search on the Syrian Patent Office website (in Arabic).
Results for a patent search on the Syrian Patent Office website (in Arabic).
Select the link to the far left of each result to view the full record for the document. The page containing the full record can be translated directly by Google Translate. The full record includes bibliographic data, abstract (when available), and indicates whether any drawings or additional diagrams are available for download (although there does not appear to be any option to download the indicated files).
Bibliographic data in the full record view for a Syrian patent document (results translated from Arabic using Google Translate).
Bibliographic data in the full record view for a Syrian patent document (results translated from Arabic using Google Translate).
Saudi Arabia: KACST Patent Search (Saudi Arabia)
The King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) “is an independent scientific organization administratively reporting to the Prime Minister” of Saudi Arabia that is both the Saudi Arabian national science agency and its laboratories. The KACST website is available in either Arabic or English. From the homepage of the English KACST website, users can select the “Services” option in the horizontal top menu, and then select the “Patent Request” option from the Services page to open the English-language patent search form. The form appears to search only SA applications (of any status).
The English-language search form includes a number of fielded search options, including:
  • Application title
  • Abstract
  • Application number
  • Filing date/number/country (drop-down menu in Arabic)
  • Application date (Hijri or Gregorian calender)
  • Publication date (Hijri or Gregorian calender)
  • Applicant name
  • Applicant nationality (drop-down menu in Arabic)
  • Inventor/designer name
  • Inventor/designer nationality (drop-down menu in Arabic)
  • Classification (IPC)
  • Patent number
  • Grant date (Hijri or Gregorian calender)
The English-language patent search form on the KACST website.
The English-language patent search form on the KACST website.
Beside each search field, users can select a question mark icon to open a help file (Arabic only). English keywords appear to be accepted by the search form.
After entering a query, the results will appear in a hit list of 30 results per page, with basic bibliographic data and status included for each result.
Hit list from a patent search on the KACST website, including basic bibliographic data for each result.
Hit list from a patent search on the KACST website, including basic bibliographic data for each result.
Users can select the invention title to view the full document record, which includes bibliographic data and an abstract (when available). In the full record view, the user can also select the “Application” or “Patent” links to download TIFF images for sections of the application and patent documents for the record.
Options to download section of the full patent document in TIFF format from the full record view.
Options to download section of the full patent document in TIFF format from the full record view.
Conclusion
The Syrian Patent Office search service is particularly difficult to navigate, due to the language barrier and the limited search options.  The bibliographic data provided by the search service is also very limited, and the abstract is often not available for many patent records. It is also unclear how the user can access the drawing files that are indicated as available for certain patent records.  In contrast, the Saudi Arabian patent search service on the KACST website is much easier for English-language users to search, thanks to an English search form with a wide variety of fielded search options.  It’s also very useful that users can directly download full-text TIFF images (in Arabic) for sections of the patent application or granted patent in the full record view.  Although the Syrian Patent Office search service provides a much more basic search interface and limited data in comparison to the KACST search, both services let users freely access patent data that would otherwise be be difficult to locate.

Google’s FTC Deal Could Alter Landscape of Patent Wars

San Diego – The deal Google struck with the Federal Trade Commission last week has received a lot of attention and many are hoping it will curtail the ongoing technology patent wars, which most agree have gotten out of control.
In the deal struck between the two entities, the FTC ruled that Google has not violated antitrust law, much to the disappointment of many of the company’s critics.  The decision came after a two-year investigation of the way Google handles licensing of its industry-standard patents to its competitors.  Google had to agree to allow its competitors access to its industry standard patents, something it had previously fought hard to prevent.
FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz said during a press conference that the patent agreement could serve as a model for other patent disputes and it could reduce patent litigation, at least in the technology sector.
As Google and Apple, two of the largest players in the technology world, spent more money on acquiring and protecting their intellectual property last year than they did on research and development, anything that can decrease those costs may benefit the companies and their customers.
At the center of the deal between the FTC and Google is the technology giant’s purchase of Motorola Mobility, which Google bought in part for Motorola’s 17,000 tech patents.  Many of these patents are standard-essential patents, which Google is required to license to its competitors on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.
The FTC’s investigation began when Motorola reneged on its agreement to license its patents according to FRAND terms.  When Google acquired Motorola, it continued to refuse licensing of industry-standard patents and began seeking injunctions to prohibit competitive products that contained its patented technology from entering the country.  Conduct like this may decrease competition and increase prices, which could hurt consumers.
Google senior vice president and chief legal officer David Drummond said, “We will seek to resolve standard-essential patent disputes through a neutral third-party before seeking injunctions.  This agreement establishes clear rules of the road for standard-essential patents going forward.”
Though the FTC’s deal with Google is not binding on any other company, it is speculated that other technology companies will use the terms of the agreement as a guide for the licensing of industry-standard patents.

Apple Unable to Secure Permanent Injunction on Samsung Devices

California - A California federal judge rejected Apple's request for a United States sales ban on a number of smartphones made by Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. that were found to infringe Apple's patents and trade dress.
Just before the holidays U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh said Apple was unable to establish that the patented features in question are features that drive sales of the iPhone, thus Apple was unable to prove the company would suffer irreparable harm because of Samsung's sale of the infringing products.
Apple requested the injunction, which would have removed 26 of Samsung's current and future products from store shelves during the heart of the holiday season, after a California jury ruled in August that Samsung had infringed six utility and design patents which Apple owns.
Apple wanted the injunction in order to force Samsung to overhaul its product lines and to give Apple a piece of the popular Galaxy S II's sales, which would have made the injunction more valuable to Apple than the $1.05 billion it was awarded by the San Francisco jury.
Apple argued that the patents Samsung is infringing cover features of the iPhone design, including its black color, metal edges, reinforced glass and glossiness, which it argued are important to consumers when purchasing a smartphone. However, Judge Koh said the entire design of the phone, not the isolated characteristics Apple pointed out, is what is protected by its patent.
Judge Koh also said it is unclear how much a consumer considers design when making a smartphone purchase. Even if it was clear that design played a large part in a consumer's decision-making, Apple did not provide evidence that the specific design features Samsung was found to have infringed actually influence a consumer's decision to purchase a specific smartphone.
"Apple makes no attempt to prove that any more specific element of the iPhone's design, let alone one covered by one of Apple's design patents, actually drives consumer demand," Judge Koh said.
In addition to denying Apple's bid for a permanent injunction, Judge Koh also denied Samsung's request for a new trial.
Samsung claimed that juror Velvin Hogan withheld information during the voir dire process regarding his involvement in litigation with Seagate Technology PLC, a company Samsung recently invested in. Judge Koh dismissed the request saying Samsung waived its arguments during the voir dire process.

Chip Maker Will Fight Record-Breaking Verdict in Patent Infringement Case

Orange County - Marvell Technology Group said it would fight the $1.17 billion in damages it was ordered to pay to Carnegie Mellon University by a Pennsylvania jury on Wednesday for infringing patents held by the university.
The Bermuda based technology company and its U.S. subsidiary, Santa Clara based Marvell Semiconductor Inc., known as MSI, were found to have knowingly infringed two of the university’s patents.  This could allow U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer to treble the damages.  The companies were also found to have contributed to infringement by their customers.
Marvell manufactures chips for hard disk drives that are used in computers, mobile phones and other wireless products.  Carnegie filed the lawsuit against Marvell in early 2009.  The patents in question cover fundamental technology that allows hard disk drive circuits to read data from high-speed magnetic disks with greater accuracy by filtering out noise and other unwanted electrical signals.
The technology was developed by a professor in Carnegie’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jose Moura, and one of his former students, Aleksandar Kavcic.  Marvell plans to fight the $1.17 billion award, which is the fourth largest award ever granted in a patent infringement case.  All three verdicts larger than the verdict against Marvell were overturned on appeal.
First Marvell will attempt to overturn the verdict with post-trial motions, and if it is unsuccessful the company believes it has a strong case for appeal.  According to Marvell, it did not infringe patents granted to Carnegie in 2001 and 2002.  The company claims the decade-old technology covered by the patents in question is impractical to use in the chips it manufactures.
“Marvell and MSI strongly believe the theoretical methods described in these patents cannot practically be built in silicon even using the most advanced techniques available today, let alone with the technology available a decade ago,” Marvell said. “Rather, Marvell and MSI use their own patented read channel technology developed in house.”  Marvell is also planning to use the fact that Carnegie Mellon University was granted the entire amount it requested to attempt to overturn the verdict.  The company claims that the amount, which was decided by a hired expert, was based on questionable assumptions rather than facts.

USPTO Rejects Key Apple Touch Patent

Los Angeles – The United States Patent and Trademark Office said in a preliminary ruling that one of Apple Inc.’s touch-related patents, a patent that played a large role in securing Apple over $1 billion in damages from Samsung Electronics,  should never have been granted.
After reexamination of the patent application by the USPTO, the agency rejected all of Apple’s 26 claims in its pinch-to-zoom patent on Wednesday.  The patent in question, patent No. 7,844,915, covers software that differentiates between single-touch and multitouch motions.  The software allows the smartphone to differentiate between scrolling and gesturing commands.
According to a document issued by the USPTO, which Samsung filed with the federal court in San Francisco on Wednesday, several portions of the patent were discarded based on findings that prior patents owned by Apple protect the same technology.  Patents are only valid if the invention is novel considering all prior art.  According to the USPTO’s report, Apple’s pinch-to-zoom patent does not live up to this standard.
Apple is expected to appeal this preliminary ruling.  The USPTO often rejects patents, only to reinstate them later, so the patent may still be held valid.  However, if the decision does hold, the rejection of the patent will have lasting consequences for Apple.  Since Apple claimed that its pinch-to-zoom patent was one of its most commercially valuable patents, demanding a $3.10 per unit royalty from Samsung for any future use of the patented technology, it could have a large impact on the verdict Apple received in August.
Samsung is already claiming that this new action from the USPTO supports its bid for a new trial, which Samsung is requesting as an attempt to reduce the $1.05 billion in damages that a San Francisco jury awarded Apple.
The pinch-to-zoom patent is only one of six of Apple’s patents that Samsung was found to be infringing during the companies’ patent trial.  However, due to Apple’s claims of the commercial importance of the patent, it could prove grounds for retrial, though it is more likely that the verdict will just be reduced.
This is the second patent related to the Samsung case that has been struck down by the USPTO since the August decision.  In October, the USPTO rejected Apple’s patent for the feature that makes pages bounce when a user swipes a finger from the top to the bottom of the touch screen.

Apple, LG Electronics did not Infringe Alcatel-Lucent’s Patents

San Diego – A jury in San Diego found that Apple Inc. and LG Electronics Inc. did not infringe patents for electronic devices including phones and computers owned by Multimedia Patent Trust, an Alcatel-Lucent SA subsidiary.  The verdict was issued Thursday after a trial that lasted more than two weeks in the Southern District of the United States District Court. The trial was presided over by U.S. District Judge Marilyn L. Huff.
The Paris-based Multimedia Patent Trust filed the lawsuit in December 2010 and it asked the jurors to award $9.1 million in royalty damages from LG Electronics and $172.3 million in royalty damages from Apple.
The Plaintiff accused LG Electronics of infringing two of its patents and Apple of infringing three of its patents for video-compression technology, which aids in sending data via satellite and over the Internet and allows for increased media storage on DVDs and Blu-Ray disks. The patent trust claimed the patents were infringed by multiple devices including LG Electronics’ Chocolate Touch VX8575, Touch AX8575, Bliss, UX700, Mystique UN610, Samba LG8575, and Lotus Elite LX610 as well as Apple’s MacBook, iMac, iPhone, iPod, and iPad. The patent trust also claimed that at least 33 different companies have paid more than $190 million to license the patents in question and Apple and LG Electronics should have to pay the licensing fees as well.
Apple and LG Electronics argued that they had in fact compensated the Multimedia Patent Trust because they are members of an industry-wide patent pool. The companies also claimed that the trust was attempting to expand the scope of its expired patents to cover technology that it does not own.
Though Apple and LG Electronics have a verdict, the two-year patent war is far from over between the companies. The patent trust has already motioned for mistrial, sighting the behavior of Apple’s counsel during closing arguments as reason to retry the case. Apple received the ruling just hours after losing a separate, unrelated case against MobileMedia, a subsidiary of Sony, MPEG-LA and Nokia. In that case a Delaware jury found Apple had infringed three patents dealing with the operation of the phone’s camera and call handling.